EXCLUSIVE DEAL - Get 3 months FREE broadband plus free GIGABIT router

Trees or Wifi? Changes to how you ‘log’ on with rural broadband.

Best rural broadband options
Tuesday, September 18, 2018

The internet is pretty much an absolute necessity for households across New Zealand and in harder to reach rural areas, that can’t be fibre broadband enabled, the wireless broadband services that are supplied by the dozens of different rural broadband providers are a lifeline to the outside world for rural homes… but that wonderful rural view may be changing with the High Court in Auckland ruling that property owners can be forced to trim or remove trees that are blocking their neighbours' broadband reception.

In the potentially precedent-setting ruling, Justice Sally Fitzgerald made the judgement after a family living north of Warkworth complained that a line of trees planted near the boundary of their property was interfering with, not only their views, but also their all-important wireless broadband reception.

The Vickerys family had a rural broadband connection that relied on a fixed-wireless broadband service provided by telecommunications company Compass.  This was transmitted from a base station 30 kilometres away and although the court accepted expert evidence that their neighbour's trees were NOT interfering with the broadband signal, Justice Fitzgerald ruled that "undue interference with a wifi signal" caused by trees could constitute an "undue interference with the reasonable use and enjoyment" of someone's land.

Fixed-wireless broadband is a very common connection type in rural areas and there are a number of different providers.  It is most commonly used for rural properties that are outside the reach of either fibre or good quality copper broadband.

Compass chief executive Karim Hussone clarified that the Vickerys' wireless broadband service was not "wifi", as it is commonly known and how it had been described by the court.  The connection that the family were using was in fact a licensed radio spectrum.

The High Court judgment did not make it clear whether trees might also have to be trimmed or removed if they were interfering with someone's 3G or 4G mobile broadband service which are being promoted heavily by Spark and Vodafone, as a practical broadband solution for townies who don’t need much of a data cap.

So where does that leave the trees in the fight against the relentless march of technology?  Well here at NZ Compare we sincerely hope they’ll be ‘Oak’ – kay… sorry!

If you are looking for a new rural broadband plan you can compare rural broadband providers here.

 

Related news
Chorus announce new ‘Hyperfibre’
Chorus recently announced that new “hyperfibre” broadband will be available from next year. What is it? How fast will it be, and when can...
Nov 21, 2019
Kiwis are moving to NOW, for a new level of service and support
NOW broadband has won New Zealand’s ‘Best Customer Support’ for the second year running in Broadband Compare | TUANZ 2019 Awards. In an industry...
Nov 20, 2019
A guide to choosing Fibre Broadband
Are you looking at making the change from ADSL or VDSL to Fibre? Not sure about Fibre 100, Fibre 200, Gigabit, or even ‘hyperfibre’?...
Nov 19, 2019
Login
×
Log in with
Sign up for free NZ Compare account
×
Log in with
3 Great Offers
×
offer
EXCLUSIVE DEAL
Get 3 months FREE broadband
And free GIGABIT router
offer
Unlimited broadband bundle
FREE BONUS with 12-month contract
FREE installation and rental router
offer
AWARD-WINNING SUPPORT
Experience the best with this exclusive deal when you join for 12 months. Terms apply.